ArticleCureus2025
Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine With High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Children With Respiratory Distress: A Retrospective Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background High-flow nasal cannulae (HFNC) are increasingly used in the management of respiratory distress in children. In pediatric patients, intubation should be considered if HFNC or noninvasive ventilation fails to improve respiratory status. Intubation is also indicated in the presence of upper airway obstruction or a sudden decline in consciousness. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a sedative agent that can be administered without compromising spontaneous respiration, has recently gained attention. Research on DEX use under non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is increasing; however, data regarding the efficacy of combining HFNC with DEX are limited. We hypothesized that adding DEX to HFNC would reduce signs of respiratory distress in children and decrease the intubation rate. Methods This single-center, retrospective case series was conducted at Showa University Hospital. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between April 1, 2021, and August 31, 2023, with respiratory distress and managed with both HFNC and DEX were included. No comparator HFNC-alone group was available. The primary outcome was respiratory rate, assessed at 3 and 12 h after the initiation of DEX administration. Results Thirteen patients were included. The median age was nine (3-28) months, and respiratory syncytial virus was the cause in eight cases. The median respiratory rate upon ICU admission was 60 (56-64) breaths/min. At 3 and 12 h after treatment initiation, respiratory rates significantly decreased to 41 (31-52) and 40 (36-50) breaths/min, respectively (p<0.05). Conclusions Combining DEX with HFNC may reduce respiratory distress and help prevent the need for tracheal intubation in pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.