ArticleLiver cancer2026
Proton Beam Therapy for Untreated Hepatocellular Carcinoma Unsuitable for Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization.
Article in Liver cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Impact of Arterial Phase Hyperenhancement After Proton Beam Therapy for Untreated Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Proton Radiotherapy Alone versus Combined with Immunotherapies or Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B or C Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) derives limited benefit from transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), which has led to introduction of the concept of "TACE-unsuitable HCC." Drug therapy may be more beneficial, but intrahepatic lesion control tends to be a problem. Particle therapy including proton beam therapy (PBT) provides high local control (LC) with minimal toxicity, even in advanced cases. On this study, we retrospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of PBT in patients with TACE-unsuitable previously untreated HCC. Methods: Between 2010 and 2018, 202 patients underwent definitive PBT for previously untreated HCC. TACE-unsuitable HCC was defined as one or more of the following; cases exceeding up-to-seven criteria, of ALBI grade 2-3, non-simple nodular type or presence of macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI). Overall survival (OS), LC, progression-free rate (PFR), and time to progression (TTP) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk factor analysis was performed using a Cox regression model. Adverse events were evaluated based on CTCAE v. 5.0. Results: TACE-unsuitable criteria were present in 165 cases. The median follow-up time was 3.35 years. The 3-year OS was 62.9%, 3-year PFR was 42.4%, and 3-year LC was 89.3%. In multivariate analysis, there were significant associations of ECOG PS, ALBI, and tumor size with OS; and of sex and tumor size with TTP; but no factors related to LC. Two cases had acute adverse events of dermatitis grade 3; and 7 cases had chronic adverse events, including 4 cases of gastrointestinal bleeding grade 3, and one each of hemobilia, pleural effusion, and erosive dermatitis. Conclusion: PBT for TACE-unsuitable previously untreated HCC, which can be a noninferior treatment option if the number of tumors is limited, but suppression of out-of-field recurrence is needed for further prolongation of survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.