SynthesisFrontiers in aging2025
Impact of digital health interventions on quality of life and mental health in older adults with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of digital Tai Chi interventions on the physical and mental health of older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Health-Related Digital Engagement and Incident Stroke Among Older Adults: Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Designing and conducting interventional trials with passive-sensing applications on patient-owned smartphones: challenges and recommendations from the BD4QoL study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Implementation barriers and facilitators of digital health interventions for older adults with multimorbidity: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- What matters in digital health technology adoption for mental healthcare? - A multistakeholder qualitative study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic diseases significantly impact the health of older adults globally. While digital health technologies offer new avenues for management, existing evidence remains inconsistent with methodological limitations. Methods: We systematically searched eight databases, including PubMed and Web of Science (from inception to 31 July 2025), for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients aged 60 and above with chronic conditions. A random-effects model was used to synthesize data to evaluate the impact of digital health interventions on general quality of life (QoL), disease-specific QoL, and mental health. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. Results: Fifteen RCTs (n = 3253) were included. The meta-analysis showed that digital health interventions significantly improved general QoL (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI [0.30, 0.78]), disease-specific QoL (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI [0.17, 0.60]), and mental health status (SMD = 0.36, 95% CI [0.22, 0.50]) in older adults with chronic diseases. Although heterogeneity was observed in some outcomes, sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. The GRADE assessment indicated that the quality of evidence for mental health improvement was high. Conclusion: Digital health interventions effectively enhance the quality of life and mental health of older adults with chronic diseases, demonstrating clear clinical significance. The evidence supports the integration of digital health technologies into routine care systems, particularly standardized interventions for patients with respiratory and metabolic diseases. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420251107861, identifier CRD420251107861.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.