Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561849›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

The impact of death literacy on self-management behaviors in gastric cancer patients: the chain mediating role of psychological adaptation and cognitive reappraisal.

Minyi Shi, Chengxi Xia, Yuxin Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Minyi ShiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Taizhou First People's Hospital, Taizhou, China.
Chengxi XiaTongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (College of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Clinical Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Yuxin YeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Taizhou First People's Hospital, Taizhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Death literacy-defined as the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that enable individuals to understand, communicate, and act effectively on issues related to death, dying, and bereavement-plays an important role in cancer patients' psychological regulation and coping behaviors. However, empirical evidence linking death literacy to self-management behaviors in gastric cancer patients remains limited. Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional design and used convenience sampling to recruit 501 gastric cancer patients from three tertiary Grade A hospitals in Zhejiang Province between August and September 2025. All participants completed the Death Literacy Scale, Self-Management Scale, Psychological Adaptation Scale, and Cognitive Reappraisal Scale. Process Model 6 was used to analyze the chain mediating effects of psychological adaptation and cognitive reappraisal. Results: Death literacy was positively correlated with self-management behaviors ( Conclusions: Death literacy functions as a positive psychological resource contributing to adaptive coping and health management among gastric cancer patients. Strengthening patients' understanding and acceptance of death may improve psychological adaptation and cognitive reappraisal, ultimately fostering better self-management and quality of life.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAttitude to DeathSelf-ManagementStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedChinaCognitionCoping SkillsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairescognitive reappraisaldeath literacygastric cancer patientspsychological adaptationself-management behaviors

Identifiers

PMID41561849
PMCPMC12812759

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.