Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561984›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025

An integrative approach between neurodiversity perspectives and quality of life models for autistic people across the spectrum of support needs.

Jon Liñares-de-Marcos, Blanca Palomero-Sierra, Victoria Sánchez-Gómez, Clara J Fernández-Álvarez, Ricardo Canal-Bedia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emergency Ambulance Healthcare for People With Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jon Liñares-de-Marcos *Institute for Community Inclusion (INICO), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Blanca Palomero-Sierra *Institute for Community Inclusion (INICO), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Victoria Sánchez-GómezInstitute for Community Inclusion (INICO), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Clara J Fernández-ÁlvarezInstitute for Community Inclusion (INICO), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Ricardo Canal-BediaInstitute for Community Inclusion (INICO), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Autism is increasingly understood not through deficit-based frameworks but through approaches that emphasize rights, inclusion, and well-being for autistic people across the spectrum of support needs, including non-speaking individuals, those with intellectual disability, and those experiencing mental health challenges. Two perspectives have been central to this shift: Quality of Life (QoL) models, rooted in applied disability research, and the neurodiversity paradigm, arising from autistic self-advocacy and social justice movements. Aim: This mini review examines the convergences and tensions between these perspectives, generating a set of integrative principles to guide support providers, researchers, and policymakers. Evidence is synthesized across three thematic perspectives: socio-political and paradigmatic debates, particularly language, identity, and representation; applied and clinical practice, including the aims, role, and risks of supports and interventions; and research, with attention to participatory approaches, lived-experience priorities, and the representation of autistic people with extensive support needs. Discussion: Six principles emerge: (i) well-being depends on both self-acceptance and the quality of supports; (ii) language should balance contextual function with individual preference; (iii) identity has transformative value, requiring diagnostic practices that are inclusive, participatory, and non-deficit oriented; (iv) supports are essential mechanisms for participation, not threats to identity; (v) interventions should promote autonomy, belonging, and growth without enforcing normalization; and (vi) research must ensure autistic participation across all stages, with accessible processes and priorities aligned with autistic preferences. Together, these principles offer a framework for integrating QoL and neurodiversity approaches in ways that advance rights, inclusion, and well-being.

Indexed as

autismidentityinclusive researchneuroaffirmative approachneurodiversityquality of lifeself-advocacysupports

Identifiers

PMID41561984
PMCPMC12812635

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.