ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
From class effects to specificity FAERS evidence and network mapping of adverse events in NSCLC targeted therapy.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, Antibody-Drug Conjugates, and Bispecific Antibodies in Oncogene-Driven Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Evolving Roles in Treatment Sequencing and Resistance Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Age-stratified adverse-event reporting signals of seven ALK/ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors in FAERS: a disproportionality and time to onset study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Chinese botanical drugs for mitigating epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy-associated cutaneous toxicity: immune mechanisms and translational pathways.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhether targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) share mechanism-driven class toxicities or mainly exhibit drug-specific risks remains unclear in real-world practice.
methodsWe analyzed reports from the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS, 2004-2025) for 14 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agents across five classes: EGFR, ALK, ROS1, RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and a KRAS G12C inhibitor. Adverse events (AEs) were standardized to MedDRA v27.0 preferred terms (PTs). Primary PT-level safety signals were defined based on concordance across four disproportionality methods: proportional reporting ratio (PRR; PRR ≥ 2, x2 ≥ 4, and ≥3 reports), reporting odds ratio (ROR; lower 95% confidence interval bound ROR025 > 1), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN; IC025 > 0), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS; EB05 ≥ 2). Cross-drug structure was evaluated via a Jaccard-based similarity network.
resultsAmong 34 948 individuals, per-drug signal counts ranged from 3 to 113. EGFR-TKIs were enriched for mucocutaneous and gastrointestinal events; ALK-TKIs for metabolic and laboratory abnormalities and selected cardiac findings; and RET-TKIs for hepatotoxicity and hypertension. Osimertinib showed prominent electrocardiographic signals (e.g., QT prolongation); lorlatinib exhibited a distinctive dyslipidemia signature. Brigatinib and crizotinib aligned with creatine kinase elevation and visual effects, respectively. No single PT occurred across all 14 drugs. Recurrent cross-class PTs included increased blood pressure, QT prolongation, dry skin, and edema. The similarity network revealed tight within-class modules (EGFR, ALK), a binary RET pair, and peripheral placement of repotrectinib and adagrasib, indicating limited overlap of their AE profiles.
conclusionThis first NSCLC-focused FAERS comparison integrating four-method signal detection with network analysis delineates reproducible class effects superimposed by drug-specific toxicities. Findings support tailored monitoring (e.g., dermatologic care for EGFR-TKIs; ECG/electrolytes for osimertinib; lipid/CK surveillance for ALK-TKIs; blood pressure/liver testing for RET-TKIs) to inform risk-aware first-line decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.