ReviewArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2026
Coronary Sinus Reduction for the Treatment of Refractory Angina: What Have We Learned after 70 Years of the Beck Surgery?
Review in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasing prevalence of chronic coronary syndromes, many patients with extensive atherosclerosis experience uncontrolled angina, even while receiving optimal medical therapy. This is especially true for patients who are not suitable candidates for surgical or percutaneous revascularization. Numerous treatments have been investigated for managing angina pectoris, and in this context, the coronary sinus reducer has emerged as a promising therapeutic option. Since the 1950s, beginning with Beck's surgery, the coronary venous sinus has been a focal point of research in anti-ischemic therapies. Significant scientific advances have been made in narrowing the venous sinus in the past two decades. Thanks to technological improvements in minimally invasive procedures and better methods for assessing myocardial blood flow, a new therapeutic option has become available for patients suffering from refractory angina and, possibly, for microvascular dysfunction. In this review, we aim to examine key concepts related to angina pectoris and myocardial ischemia, highlighting the historical background, pathophysiological rationale, and technical aspects of coronary sinus reduction as a therapy for refractory angina. Additionally, we will explore the scientific evidence from recent decades, as well as identify existing gaps and outline future research directions concerning this emerging treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.