ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2026
Factors associated with extensions and withdrawals from stricto sensu graduate programs in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic: emphasis on mental health.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Master's and doctoral degrees in nursing in Brazil: an ecological study.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
to analyze the factors associated with extension of the completion deadline and the course withdrawals by Brazilian students enrolled in stricto sensu graduate programs during the COVID-19 pandemic, with emphasis on mental health. cross-sectional analytical study conducted with 5,286 graduate students enrolled in 2022. Data were collected through an electronic form that contained sociodemographic, academic, and health information, including a history of mental disorders. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed using logistic regression through R software. the study found that 38% of participants extended their courses and 4.8% withdrew from enrollment. Extension was associated with pursuing a doctorate, studying Engineering or Biological Sciences, reporting training difficulties, and presenting mental health problems. Participation in remote classes and a previous diagnosis of hypertension emerged as protective factors. Withdrawal was associated with having children, studying Engineering, facing pandemic difficulties, presenting mental health problems, and having a history of academic leave. Being a scholarship holder was a protective factor, reducing the chances of withdrawal by 50%. the findings indicate that extensions and withdrawals are related to academic, personal and health factors, highlighting the need for institutional policies that promote comprehensive support, with special attention to mental health and retention in graduate programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.