ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Endometriosis and eating disorders: epidemiology, shared neurobiology, and clinical implications.
Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Low-FODMAP Diet for Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Endometriosis: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- Advancing the frontiers of phytotherapy: a comprehensive review of botanical interventions targeting mitochondrial quality control to ameliorate endometriosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests that women with endometriosis may be particularly vulnerable to disordered eating behaviors (DEBs) and clinically defined eating disorders (EDs). This narrative review aims at integrating and critically analyzing the current evidence regarding the relationship between endometriosis and EDs, as well as highlighting the psychosocial and neurobiological vulnerabilities of women with endometriosis to DEBs. A large-scale genetic study showed a nearly threefold increase in the odds of EDs in women with endometriosis, and a significant genetic correlation. Although the prevalence of formal ED diagnoses appears low in small clinical samples, DEBs such as emotional eating, binge tendencies, and maladaptive dietary restriction, are common and strongly associated with pain intensity, and borderline BMI. Psychological factors, including body image disturbance, heightened self-criticism, emotional dysregulation, and the need for control further contribute to the vulnerability to EDs. At the biological level, the dysregulation of leptin, endocannabinoids, dopamine, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and inflammatory cytokines, molecules involved in both appetite regulation and some aspects of the pathophysiology of endometriosis, suggests overlapping neuroimmune pathways that may link endometriosis to DEBs and EDs. Clinical management must, therefore, integrate screening for DEBs, supervised and personalized dietary counseling, balanced exercise prescription, and psychological interventions targeting pain coping, emotion regulation, and body image. A multidimensional, biopsychosocial framework is essential to prevent the onset or exacerbation of EDs in women with endometriosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.