SynthesisJournal of neurology2026
The differences in sex ratio between sporadic and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mortality From Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Finland 1987-2022.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- The Versatile Roles of Exosomes in Neurodegenerative Disorders: From Pathological Mechanism and Diagnostic Biomarkers to Therapeutic Application.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is more prevalent in males than in females. However, it is unclear whether the difference in sex ratio is observed similarly in sporadic compared to familial ALS. Here, we conducted a systematic review to investigate the differences in sex ratio between familial and sporadic ALS. Following the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines, this study searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, SCOPUS and Cochrane databases. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate sex ratios in a total of 9269 ALS patients (4135 female, 5134 male) across 20 included studies. We confirmed that ALS is more prevalent in males than in females (sex ratio: 1.25 (95%CI 1.14-1.37). However, when we stratified the analyses, the sex ratio was only different in sporadic ALS. Male-to-female ratios were 1.29 (95% CI 1.16-1.42) for sporadic ALS and 1.05 (95% CI 0.93-1.18) for familial ALS. A further analysis showed a pooled risk ratio of 1.07 (95% CI 1.00-1.15), indicating a 7% higher likelihood of males being diagnosed with sporadic rather than familial ALS. These findings highlight the importance of considering sex-specific factors in ALS research and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.