ReviewJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2026
Management of Dialysis for Patients Receiving Mechanical Circulatory Support.
Review in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanical circulatory support is used to augment circulatory flow in cardiogenic shock and end-stage heart failure. Support can last from hours for temporary mechanical circulatory support to years for durable mechanical circulatory support. The physiologic relationship of heart and kidney function and the epidemic of cardio-kidney-metabolic disease lead to frequent use of simultaneous mechanical circulatory support and extracorporeal KRT (dialysis). The need for dialysis can range from short periods of AKI in cardiogenic shock to long-term dialysis for individuals who receive left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) for destination therapy in advanced heart failure and progress to CKD G5 with replacement therapy. Changes in technology, clinical evidence, and organ transplantation have led to major changes in mechanical circulatory support use. With temporary mechanical circulatory support, devices and clinical situations vary widely, with intra-aortic balloon pumps, microaxial flow pumps, and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation providing different levels of circulatory support. Considerations for dialysis, whether for AKI or CKD G5, are discussed. In durable mechanical circulatory support, LVADs are now used primarily for permanent therapy, and most LVAD recipients survive for more than 5 years, time in which kidney dysfunction can develop or progress. Outpatient dialysis with LVADs is performed for both AKI and for CKD G5, with in-center intermittent hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or home hemodialysis. This article discusses considerations specific to dialysis in temporary and durable circulatory support, including the challenging aspects of volume management and complication risks. Concurrent mechanical circulatory support and dialysis present diverse clinical challenges in patients with complex medical needs. Meeting this challenge requires close cooperation and shared decision making incorporating cardiologists, nephrologists, other medical professionals, patients, and their caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.