ArticlePloS one2026
Cerebral microbleed patterns and the risk of incident dementia in elderly adults: The ARIC study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe association between cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), an indicator of microvascular damage on MRI, and incident dementia (ID) remains inconclusive. We aim to investigate the interplay of CMB presence, number, and location with ID in a large community-based elderly cohort.
methodsThe study included 1532 dementia-free participants (aged ≥ 65 years) derived from baseline examinations (2012-2013) of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS). The ID cases were diagnosed at visits 6 (2016-2017), 7 (2018-2019), and 8 (2019-2020). Cox proportional-hazards models were deployed to assess the association of CMB presence, number, and location with ID.
resultsOver a nine-year follow-up (median = 8.1 years), 390 participants developed ID. Microbleed (MB) presence was related to an increased ID risk (HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.02-1.51). A stronger association was observed in those with mixed (lobar+subcortical) MBs (HR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.10-2.30). Compared to participants without MBs, those with ≥ 2 CMBs in any MBs, any lobar MBs, and any subcortical MBs were associated with 57%, 174%, and 74% higher ID risks. Furthermore, those with a pattern of only lobar MBs or superficial siderosis had the highest ID risk (HR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.26-2.65).
interpretationIn this large community-based elderly cohort, we identified that the presence of MBs or a high MB count (i.e., ≥ 2), with some specificity for location, was independently related to an increased ID risk over a nine-year follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.