ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2026
Heavy metal blood concentrations in smelters and chimney sweepers in Norway.
Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSmelter workers and chimney sweepers may be exposed to heavy metals via particulate matter through airways and skin uptake. We hypothesized that these workers have higher blood concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, and mercury compared to an office-worker group. Furthermore, we hypothesized that their concentrations increased cross-week despite the use of properly fitted respiratory protective equipment (RPE). Our aim was to uncover workers' general heavy metal concentrations and cross-week changes to provide further insight into industrial occupational exposure.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study with 2 repeated measures. We quantified whole blood arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, and mercury 4 d apart. Participants answered a standardized questionnaire and log scheme on work exposure. Samples were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, and we used Wilcoxon's signed-rank test and multiple linear regression to assess heavy metal differences across the 4-d workweek and occupational groups.
resultsOut of 226 participants (99 smelter workers, 80 chimney sweepers, and 47 office workers), 185 participants provided blood samples. The final dataset included 151 participants. Overall, heavy metal concentrations were below Mayo Clinic's cutoff concentrations. Multiple linear regression analysis with confounders did not show higher concentrations of heavy metals in the exposed occupations compared to office workers. Instead, we found statistically significant lower chromium in smelter workers. Sensitivity power analysis showed that our nonsignificant findings in the other metals were underpowered. Wilcoxon's signed rank test did not show cross-week increase.
conclusionsIn our population of chimney sweepers and smelter workers with high percentage use of RPE, occupational exposure to heavy metals does not seem to increase workers blood heavy metals; lifestyle factors seem more important. Further studies with higher number of participants are warranted to ensure our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.