ArticleJMIR aging2026
Predictive Model of Acupuncture Adherence in Alzheimer Disease: Secondary Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Article in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The therapeutic efficacy of acupuncture in treating Alzheimer disease (AD) largely depends on consistent treatment adherence. Therefore, identifying key factors influencing adherence and developing targeted interventions are crucial for enhancing clinical outcomes. Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model for identifying patients with AD who are likely to maintain good adherence to acupuncture treatment. Methods: This secondary analysis included 108 patients with probable AD, aged 50 to 85 years, from 2 independent randomized controlled trials conducted at Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences. Of all, 66 patients were assigned to the development cohort and 42 to the external validation cohort. Acupuncture adherence was defined as the proportion of completed sessions relative to scheduled sessions, with good adherence defined as ≥80% completion. Baseline data included demographic, clinical, cognitive, functional, psychological, and caregiving variables. Multivariable logistic regression with backward stepwise selection was used to identify significant predictors, and a nomogram was constructed based on the final model. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis, with external validation performed by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity analysis was performed using alternative adherence thresholds of 70% and 90%. Results: A higher number of treatments during the first month was associated with a significant increase in the odds of good adherence (odds ratio [OR] 3.06, 95% CI 1.68-7.01; P=.002), while longer disease duration (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-1.00; P=.049) and receiving care from a part-time caregiver (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.72; P=.022) were associated with lower odds of adherence. Sensitivity analyses further supported the stability and reliability of the model. Conclusions: This study is the first to develop and validate a predictive model for acupuncture adherence in patients with AD. In clinical research, it can facilitate participant stratification and help identify individuals who may need additional adherence support, thereby reducing bias and enhancing trial quality. In clinical practice, the nomogram enables proactive adherence management by prospectively identifying high-risk patients and guiding targeted strategies to improve adherence and optimize therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.