ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2026
Time-Series Machine Learning for Prediction of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.
Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dynamic temporal partitioning enhanced transformer for pediatric viral load forecasting.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo build a time-series machine learning (ML) model that improves bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) prediction compared with published online calculators. STUDY
designWe used a single-center, extremely low gestational age newborn cohort (inborn, birth year 2016-2021, n = 438). The primary outcome was a 5-level class outcome for BPD as defined by the Neonatal Research Network (NRN) in 2019. Flowsheet data were extracted from the electronic medical record. Time-series data were generated from birth onward, with 14 static and 35 dynamic input attributes. Iterative static (regression) and dynamic (ML) modeling was performed, comparing model performance with the NRN BPD calculator at several time points (postnatal day 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28) and ranking feature leverage at each time point.
resultsOf the original cohort, 92 infants met all inclusion criteria (gestational age 25.6 ± 1.4 weeks). Static models performed comparably with the NRN BPD calculator (area under the curve = 0.7460), improving to 0.7978 with forward/backward selection. In contrast, dynamic long short-term memory (LSTM) models outperformed static models at all time points, reaching a peak area under the curve of 0.8400 on postnatal day 28. LSTM models performed best for no BPD and severe disease/death. Principal component analysis revealed that respiratory support, ventilator settings, supplemental oxygen requirements, medications, and prenatal/postnatal growth were major factors driving BPD severity.
conclusionsLSTM-based ML time-series analysis substantially outperformed static approaches for predicting BPD and death among extremely low gestational age newborns. Integrating ML methods into clinical applications holds promise for enhancing real-time BPD trajectory mapping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.