Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41565780›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026

The relationship between uncertainty and trust in genomic medicine and research: A literature review and thematic analysis.

Fabian Cannizzo, Lyndsay Newett, Rebekah McWhirter, Ainsley J Newson, Vanessa Warren, Dianne Nicol

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fabian CannizzoMonash University, Melbourne, Australia. fabian.cannizzo@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5159-8677
Lyndsay NewettAustralian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1664-3620
Rebekah McWhirterAustralian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Ainsley J NewsonUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3460-772X
Vanessa WarrenUniversity of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.
Dianne NicolUniversity of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6553-2839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concepts of uncertainty and trust in genomic research and clinical care have not been consistently defined across studies, leading to varied claims about the relationship between them. The role that social groups play in this relationship is also therefore unclear. A categorisation of themes of trust and uncertainty will help to clarify and compare research claims. A review was conducted of peer-reviewed literature that discussed both 'trust' and 'uncertainty' in genomics research and/or medicine from 1 January 2018 to 28 June 2024. Exclusion criteria removed studies that did not focus on human genomics, and did not mention 'trust' or 'uncertainty'. Discussions of 'trust', 'uncertainty' and 'social groups' were coded into distinct categories. The search returned 1070 unique abstracts from which 26 studies passed the exclusion criteria. Sixteen distinct uses of 'trust' and fifteen uses of 'uncertainty' were identified alongside sixteen social groups. Relationships between uncertainty and trust were often described as being mediated by a third variable. Irreducible forms of uncertainty reported in studies suggest a need to move towards assisting patients and data donors understand and feel comfortable with uncertainty and make use of 'productive uncertainties' to foster trust. More research is needed to understand how social group belonging may shape the relationship between trust and uncertainty.

Indexed as

Genomic MedicineGenomicsTrustHumansUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID41565780
PMCPMC13634031

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.