Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41565796›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Integrated assessment of environmental infrastructural and social risks for urban public safety.

Sicheng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sicheng LiuDepartment of International Relations, Faculty of International Management and Business, Budapest Business University, Budapest, 1165, Hungary. 15517001105@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban public safety is shaped by the interaction of environmental, infrastructural, and social risks that often overlap across rapidly urbanizing regions. This study develops an integrated framework combining Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), and machine learning models to assess composite urban risk. Using spatial datasets on land surface temperature, air quality, drainage, building conditions, demographics, and crime from the selected metropolitan region, the study constructs risk indicators and evaluates cross-domain interactions. Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT) and Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN) were trained on harmonized data using k-fold and temporal-block validation. The models achieved strong predictive performance (AUC = 0.91, RMSE = 6.2), confirming robustness. Spatial analysis revealed high-risk clusters along river-adjacent settlements and central transport corridors. Scenario simulations showed that structural upgrades (e.g., drainage enhancement) and green infrastructure reduced composite risks by up to 22-30%, particularly benefiting low-income neighborhoods. Equity-weighted decision analysis further prioritized interventions that improved both safety and resilience. The framework provides a scalable, data-driven approach for diagnosing and mitigating compound urban risks, offering actionable insights for policymakers under resource constraints.

Indexed as

Boosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsCitiesDecision Support TechniquesDecision TreesEnvironmentGeographic Information SystemsHumansMachine LearningRisk AssessmentComposite risk assessmentGIS–MCDAMachine learningResilience planningUrban public safety

Identifiers

PMID41565796
PMCPMC12894855

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.