ArticleScientific reports2026
Reciprocal cooperative gating fusion of SqueezeNet and ShuffleNetV2 for breast cancer detection in histopathology images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a critical global health challenge, with timely and reliable diagnosis being essential for improving clinical outcomes. Although recent advances in computer aided diagnosis (CAD) have increasingly adopted deep learning, many existing solutions rely on computationally intensive architectures such as Transformer based models, deep ensemble models, multi scale attention networks, DenseNet based frameworks that limit their practical utility. To overcome this limitation, we proposed a comparatively lightweight Reciprocal Gating Fusion framework that integrates two efficient convolutional neural networks, SqueezeNet and ShuffleNetV2, enabling high quality feature extraction with substantially reduced computational overhead. The proposed reciprocal gating mechanism facilitates structured bidirectional interaction between the networks, enhancing complementary feature exchange while suppressing redundant responses to produce a more informative fused representation. Extensive empirical evaluations on benchmark datasets demonstrate strong performance and generalization capability, achieving 97% multiclass accuracy and 99% binary accuracy on the ICIAR-2018 dataset, along with 99.72% accuracy on the BreakHis dataset at 100× magnification. These results highlight the effectiveness of the proposed framework in delivering a precise and dependable CAD solution for breast cancer detection. The code is made available at: https://github.com/Cmatermedicalimageanalysis/RCG_ICIAR_Breakhis
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.