ArticleScientific reports2026
A machine learning approach for predicting osmotic coefficients and deriving activity coefficients in alkyl ammonium salts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quaternary Ammonium Salts (Quats) have diverse applications across various domains. They are extensively used as phase-transfer catalysts (PTCs) in chemical reactions, facilitating the transfer of reactants between aqueous and organic phases. Their unique structure enables the formation of ion pairs, enhancing reaction rates at phase boundaries. This research develops a novel method for predicting Quats' osmotic coefficients using Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System (SMILES) notation and supervised machine learning. A comprehensive dataset of 1,654 data points from 52 distinct Quats was compiled. The structural characteristics were encoded using SMILES notation. The data was evaluated using random splitting and Leave-One-Group-Out (LOGO) validation to train seven machine learning algorithms. Gaussian Process (GP) emerged as the optimal algorithm. The GP model achieved a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 5.29% and root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.034. Comparisons with Electrolyte-NRTL and Extended UNIQUAC models demonstrate that this data-driven approach offers competitive accuracy while enabling generalization to structurally similar compounds. This work marks a significant starting point for the machine learning-enhanced prediction of activity coefficients, with considerable potential for future refinement and application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.