ArticleArchives of toxicology2026
Classification of industrial chemicals for respiratory chemosensory irritation using the TRPV1-expressing neuronal SH-SY5Y cell model and machine learning.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory sensory irritation is the basis for many occupational exposure limits. Irritation thresholds have hitherto mainly been identified in humans by questionnaires and in mice by measuring the inhaled concentration causing 50% respiratory depression (RD50). Both methods are ethically questionable. We investigated an alternative New Approach Methodology (NAM) approach, namely the neuronal SH-SY5Y cell model expressing the sensory receptor TRPV1 in combination with random forest-based machine learning. The intracellular Ca2+ concentration was monitored during acute exposure to different concentrations of 34 organic chemicals. Potency and efficacy were determined with and without the TRPV1 antagonist capsazepine (CZ). Fifteen of the chemicals induced TRPV1 activation at some concentrations, however only phenol appeared as a true TRPV1 agonist. Using machine learning, the parameters EC20, Emax, concentration at Emax, the two first components from principal component analyses, and pH were analysed against previously published RD50 data to classify each chemical as non-irritant/irritant or as non-irritant/ intermediate/irritant. The best 2-class model (accuracy 0.90, outlier frequency 4.8%) was the one using experiments with CZ present, suggesting that the irritancy was not mediated by TRPV1 activation. The best 3-class model (accuracy 0.77, outlier frequency 5.7%) was the one using data without CZ, indicating that TRPV1 activation may play a role for intermediate irritation. The three false negative chemicals, as predicted by the NAMs, were the most irritating chemicals according to RD50 determined in vivo, indicating that other processes may also be important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.