ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Midwives practices and mothers' experiences during intrapartum midwifery care: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimited research addresses the intersection of women's intrapartum care experiences and midwives' daily practices within the same facilities, resulting in insufficient documentation of discrepancies between expectations and care routines. For women with low-risk pregnancies, midwife-led care is optimal. Quality intrapartum care measures are essential for reducing avoidable maternal-newborn morbidity and mortality. One factor contributing to the high rate of maternal and neonatal morbidity is sub-standard care. Thus, this study aimed to understand midwives’ practices and mothers’ experiences during intrapartum care.
methodsThis exploratory qualitative descriptive study was conducted in three health facilities in South Western Uganda between April 2025 and May 2025. Eleven (11) mothers admitted in early labour, expecting a normal physiological birth, and receiving midwifery care were purposively selected. Through nonparticipant direct observation ten (10) midwives were observed while caring for mothers in labour and in-depth interviews were conducted with the mothers after receiving care. Latent content analysis was applied for direct observations data, thematic analysis was applied for in-depth interviews data finally both data sets were triangulated.
resultsThree main themes emerged: “Disrespectful and Abusive intrapartum care” This emerged from three sub themes: Mistreatment, lack of emotional support and empathy, and abandonment of care. “Violation of Clinical Guidelines and Protocols”, Four important subthemes gave rise to the main theme: Retrospective filling of the labour care guide, disregard for women's rights during childbirth, improper immediate transfers of postpartum mothers by non-healthcare personnel, and lack of informed consent. “Mixed Perception of care” emerged from experiences with positive care, normalization of poor care and showing gratitude despite challenges.
conclusionTo enhance midwives' care practices and satisfy women's needs and preferences, it is crucial that they get ongoing support supervision and training, with an emphasis on guidelines and woman-centered care. We advise including respect, empathy, accountability, and good communication into every aspect of intrapartum care. This will improve maternal-newborn outcomes, create a positive childbirth experience, and restore women's trust in facility-based birth services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.