ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2026
Development and validation of an inflammatory index-based interpretable machine learning model for mortality risk stratification in hemodialysis patients.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHemodialysis patients with end-stage renal disease have high all-cause mortality, with chronic low-grade inflammation as a key prognostic factor. Existing mortality prediction models lack both accuracy and clinical interpretability, and no studies have systematically integrated multiple inflammatory indices (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, etc.) into interpretable tools for this population.
methodsA single-center retrospective cohort study included 512 hemodialysis patients (Jan 2021-Oct 2024) from The Central Hospital of Wuhan, split into training (70%), validation (15%), and test (15%) sets per TRIPOD guidelines. Fifteen baseline clinical variables and five inflammatory indices were collected. Missing data were imputed, data normalized, and oversampling used to address imbalance. Twelve models (9 traditional machine learning, 1 neural network, 2 ensembles) were built, optimized via tenfold cross validation, and interpreted with SHapley Additive exPlanations.
resultsAt follow-up (Oct 30, 2024), 212 (41.4%) patients died. Non-survivors differed significantly from survivors in myocardial infarction (16.0% vs. 2.7%, p < 0.001), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (median: 4.1 vs. 3.6, p = 0.012), dialysis vintage (42.5 vs. 77.5 months, p < 0.001), and age (62.2 ± 12.3 vs. 58.1 ± 13.3 years, p < 0.001). The Stacking model performed best (AUC = 0.983, accuracy = 0.922), outperforming logistic regression (AUC = 0.703). Body mass index, myocardial infarction history, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were top predictors.
conclusionsThe interpretable stacking model enables accurate mortality risk stratification for hemodialysis patients. Future multi-center validation and multi-modal data integration will enhance its generalizability for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.