ArticleBMC public health2026
Causal analysis of traditional and environmental risk factors for long-term development of type 2 diabetes using a conditional survival Bayesian network: evidence from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOver the past decade, traditional demographic, lifestyle, and metabolic factors, along with air pollutants, have increasingly been recognized as key contributors to type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the comprehensive causal structure among these factors and their individual and interacting interventional effects have seldom been characterized in long-term population studies.
methodsUsing 11-year follow-up data from 2,102 adults without T2D in the Ansan cohort of the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES), we investigated causal pathways among demographic, lifestyle, metabolic factors, and multiple ambient air pollutants leading to long-term T2D incidence. We employed a Conditional Survival Bayesian Network (CSBN), which integrates survival analysis with Bayesian network modeling to accommodate censored and incomplete data, to visualize the causal structure among risk factors, and to estimate both individual and joint (interaction) interventional effects.
resultsThe CSBN depicted a holistic causal structure showing how multiple risk factors jointly shape T2D development over the 11-year follow-up and helped distinguish putative direct/indirect pathways from associations likely reflecting confounding. Interventional analysis quantified each factor’s causal contribution to the 11-year T2D incidence. Obesity produced the largest individual effect: setting BMI to the obese category approximately doubled 11-year T2D risk compared with normal weight. High alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and older age increased risk by about 40–50%, while family history of T2D, dyslipidemia, overweight, [Formula: see text], and gaseous pollutants had intermediate effects. Furthermore, the CSBN uncovered synergistic interactions mainly among metabolic factors. In particular, ALT with family history, dyslipidemia, or obesity displayed strong additive interactions. By contrast, air pollutants were found to influence T2D independently rather than through interactions with other risk factors.
conclusionThese findings underscore the importance of integrated public health strategies targeting multiple risk factors to effectively curb T2D incidence. The CSBN’s capability to explicitly model complex causal interactions highlights the necessity for advanced epidemiological analyses to inform targeted preventive measures and efficient resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.