ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2026
Broad cross-T cell immunity between emerging SARS-CoV-2 serotypes waved by spike-signature mutations.
Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since its emergence in late 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has continuously threatened human health through constantly arising variants with iterative immune escape abilities. While SARS-CoV-2 variants have been recently classified into six serotypes based on cross-reactive antibody responses, T cell response features against these serotypes remain largely unknown. We evaluated SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific T cell responses among convalescents infected by three different strains (prototype, BA.5.2/BF.7, and XBB/EG.5.1) against SARS-CoV-2 prototype and 15 subvariants covering all six serotypes. Generally, cross-reactive T cells could recognize variants within the same serotype, but they also mounted weaker responses to variants from subsequent serotypes. Serotype I (prototype) convalescents showed lower T cell responses against Omicron variants (Serotype II to IV), with cross-reactive T cell gaps between different serotype strains, i.e. Serotype II > III > IV. Serotype IV (BA.5.2/BF.7) convalescents exhibited weaker T cell responses to Serotype V (XBB/XBB.1.5/XBB.1.16/EG.5.1) strains and even lower responses to Serotype VI (BA.2.86/JN.1) strains. Similarly, Serotype V (XBB) convalescents showed significantly weaker cross-T cell responses to the Serotype VI (BA.2.86) strains than to the Serotype V strains. We also identified key serotype-signature mutations in T cell epitope hotspot regions that could attenuate CD8
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.