ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Generating Dynamic Structures Through Physics-Based Sampling of Predicted Inter-Residue Geometries.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Physics-Experiment Trinity for Integrated Protein Dynamics Modeling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Advances and challenges in multiscale biomolecular simulations: artificial intelligence-driven paradigm shift.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Powers Protein Functional Annotation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning-based methods, such as AlphaFold2, have revolutionized the prediction of static protein structures. However, modeling alternative conformations and dynamic structures remains an unsolved problem. Here, we present trRosettaX2-Dynamics (trX2-D), an innovative solution building on our CASP15 and CASP16 winning method, trRosettaX2. trX2-D tackles this challenge by employing physics-based iterative sampling of trRosettaX2's predicted inter-residue geometric distributions. The model underwent pre-training on high-resolution X-ray structures, followed by fine-tuning on approximately 7000 dynamic NMR structures. This dual training regime significantly bolsters its capacity to predict alternative conformations and dynamic structures. At its core, trX2-D employs a Transformer-based neural network to initially predict a set of inter-residue geometric constraints. These constraints are then iteratively sampled to generate dynamic structures, entirely circumventing the need for prior knowledge of native structural states. Extensive benchmarking across three distinct datasets-two focused on alternative conformations and one on dynamic structures-demonstrates trX2-D's promising ability to predict alternative conformations and accurately capture structural dynamics. This work highlights the potential of integrating deep learning predictions with physics-based sampling to advance the field of protein dynamic structure prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.