ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Revealing intra-group immunotherapy response heterogeneity in metastatic urothelial carcinoma through interpretable feature extraction and spectral clustering.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) but clinical responses remain highly heterogenous. Traditional binary classification of response overlooks clinically relevant variability within each group but a more detailed understanding of intra-group heterogeneity may support subclass-specific therapeutic strategies. Methods: We developed a novel analysis framework that integrates interpretable feature extraction and spectral clustering to identify patient subclasses associated with heterogeneous responses to ICIs. This method was applied to tumor transcriptomic data from the IMvigor210 cohort (n = 298), comprising mUC patients treated with atezolizumab. Interpretable features based on SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were computed from a response classification model to quantify patient-level gene contributions, which were then used for spectral clustering. An independent cohort (GSE176307, n = 88) was used for external validation. Results: This approach identified four patient clusters with distinct immune phenotypes and response patterns. Cluster 3 (92.3% responders) showed an inflamed phenotype with high PD-L1 expression, T cell activation, and TP53 mutations. Cluster 1 (100% non-responders) displayed an immune-desert phenotype with FGFR3 mutations and elevated TGF-β signaling. Cluster 2 was more heterogeneous, containing two subgroups (Sub 1 and Sub 2) with differing immune activity and immunosuppressive gene expression, corresponding to response rates of 23.2% and 77.3%, respectively. Similar patterns were observed in the validation cohort. Conclusions: Our framework, which combines SHAP-based interpretable feature extraction with spectral clustering, revealed subclass-level heterogeneity in ICI response, highlighting biologically distinct immune subclasses. This approach may facilitate the development of subclass-specific therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.