Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567235›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health in Africa2025

Enhancing awareness and uptake of home-based care services during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Zambia.

Kelvin Mwangilwa, Cephas Sialubanje, Nyuma Mbewe, Naeem M I Dalal, Oliver Mweso, Stephen Longa Chanda, Musole Chipoya, Roureen P Landson, Chilufya S A Mulenga, Moses Mwale and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health in Africa, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Kelvin MwangilwaZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5099-3392
Cephas SialubanjeZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9077-1436
Nyuma MbeweZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3309-0538
Naeem M I DalalZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1647-8482
Oliver MwesoZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2166-1062
Stephen Longa ChandaZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4326-8571
Musole ChipoyaZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5103-9042
Roureen P LandsonZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9676-6777
Chilufya S A MulengaZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6779-4044
Moses MwaleWorld Health Organization, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3414-3523
Moses BandaZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1252-1615
Vivian M MwaleZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9645-4183
Priscilla N GardnerZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8937-3142
Geoffrey MutitiZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2821-2936
Lilian LambaZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4431-3338
Charles ChilesheZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9388-7986
Peter FunsaniZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1236-4044
Davie SimwabaZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3021-8349
Paul M ZuluZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2653-4428
Raymond HamoongaZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8374-634X
Malambo MutilaZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4148-1993
Innocent HamuganyuZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8271-9947
Jonathan MwanzaZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7877-5058
Olive ChiboolaZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1093-531X
Nyambe SinyangeZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3706-4765
Muzala Kapin'aZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8469-9108
Nkomba KayeyiSouthern Africa Institute for Collaborative Research and Innovative Organization (SAICRIO), Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4043-5872
Fred KapayaZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6583-7432
Mazyanga L MazabaZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5465-5710
Roma ChilengiZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0221-9527

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic placed pressure on health systems, exposing workforce shortages and prompting innovative strategies to manage patients with mild to moderate symptoms. Home-based care emerged as a practical approach to reduce facility burden while maintaining quality care. Aim: To assess the implementation and acceptability of the COVID-19 home management model in Zambia. Setting: The study was conducted in 11 purposively selected districts with high levels of home-based management. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted. Data were collected in June 2023 and September 2023 from 566 individuals with confirmed COVID-19 eligible for home management, sampled systematically from health facility line lists. Descriptive statistics summarised participant characteristics, and multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with accepting home-based care. Results: Sixty per cent participants were female, with a median age of 28 years. Awareness of the home management model (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 5.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.61-10.0), income between 600 and 1000 kwacha (AOR = 2.64; 95% CI: 1.10-6.85), and perceiving the model as effective (AOR = 7.88; 95% CI: 3.56-18.3) increased odds of acceptance, while formal employment reduced it (AOR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.18-0.78). Conclusion: Home-based care is a strategy for easing health system pressure. Strengthening awareness and addressing socio-economic barriers could increase uptake in Zambia. Contribution: This study contributes new evidence on the determinants of home-based care uptake within a low-resource context. The study provides actionable insights for policymakers and programme implementers seeking to strengthen community-based models of care.

Indexed as

awarenessCOVID-19healthcare utilisationhome-based carepatient uptakesocio-economic factorsZambia

Identifiers

PMID41567235
PMCPMC12816998

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.