ArticleDigital health
Skin cancer awareness and sun protection advice for outdoor workers in Australia: Review of communication channels to optimise reach and relevance.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Skin cancer incidence in Australia is among the highest in the world, particularly for outdoor workers, and requires, clear and relevant health promotion resources. Government and non-government organisations across Australia play a key role in providing information and advice on how skin cancer awareness and sun protection advice should be promoted to at-risk population groups like outdoor workers. This study reviewed online resources developed by key organisations around recommended methods for communicating skin cancer awareness and sun protection messages to outdoor workers/outdoor workplaces. Methods: A rapid desktop review was undertaken in April 2021, focusing on publicly available online resources developed by federal government, state governments and cancer councils and available on websites in Australia. Resources included were selected if they addressed skin cancer, skin cancer prevention, sun safety or sun protection for outdoor workplaces and/or outdoor workers. Selected resources were re-reviewed in November 2024 to compare for changes. Results: Twenty-five resources were included in this review. Most (19/25) provided advice about how to communicate skin cancer awareness/sun protection messages to outdoor workers, while some did not (4/25). Use of digital technology to reach outdoor workers with sun-safe messages was mentioned in 12/25 resources. These resources mainly encouraged the use of the SunSmart Ultraviolet (UV) mobile application (8/25), specific sun-safety websites (3/25) and/or participation in an online course (2/25). Resources also mentioned non-digital ways of communicating information to outdoor workers. Conclusion: Digital technology is increasingly being used to communicate skin cancer prevention-related messages to outdoor workers, but non-digital ways are still more common. Increasing awareness about the effectiveness of digital health interventions in skin cancer prevention via online resources is essential for future-proofing sun-safety uptake in contemporary outdoor workplaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.