SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025
Evaluation of health equity frameworks in telehealth and digital health: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identifying and alleviating ethical risks of artificial intelligence in physical education: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Trends and inequities in primary and emergency care use among older adults in British Columbia: an analysis across age, sex, income, and rurality (2018-2023).International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Recurring implementation determinants in digital health innovations: a multi-context multiple case study and cross-case synthesis into a four-domain analytical framework.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- A large language model-enhanced knowledge graph framework for text-implied public health policy gap screening: digital health executability, behavioral accessibility, and service-support coverage.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Multicenter evaluation of a digital screening tool for early identification of temporomandibular disorder risk in Colombian and Mexican adults.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Sober curiosity among LGBTQ+ women and non-binary people in Aotearoa New Zealand.Women's health (London, England)Article
- Life-Course Access to Speech and Language Therapy: A Rights-Based AAAQ Policy Mapping in Türkiye and Four Comparator Settings.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The rise of telehealth and digital health solutions has been promoted as a transformative approach to bridging healthcare access gaps. However, these technologies may introduce new disparities related to digital literacy, Internet access, and technology affordability. While several health equity frameworks exist for traditional healthcare delivery, their applicability to telehealth contexts remains unclear. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus databases for peer-reviewed articles discussing health equity frameworks relevant to telehealth and digital health. A narrative synthesis approach was employed, complemented by a tailored quality appraisal assessing Clarity, Theoretical Basis, Comprehensiveness, and Applicability to telehealth. Framework elements were categorized into drivers, measures, and enablers/modifiers of health equity. Results: The search yielded 707 records; after removing 25 duplicates, 27 full-text articles were assessed, and 17 were included in the final synthesis. Thirteen unique health equity frameworks were identified. Six frameworks were explicitly developed for digital health, telehealth, or eHealth contexts, while seven were general health equity frameworks with potential applicability to telehealth. Eight frameworks demonstrated moderate-to-high quality scores. Across frameworks, notable gaps remain in addressing telehealth-specific challenges and in providing actionable guidance for real-world implementation. Conclusion: Existing frameworks provide valuable insights but require adaptation to address telehealth-specific challenges fully. Tailored frameworks that incorporate digital determinants of health, prioritize equitable access to technology, and facilitate system integration are essential. These advancements will enable telehealth to effectively reduce health disparities and advance equity in healthcare access. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/607575, Identifier PROSPERO (CRD42024607575).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.