ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2025
Deep learning models for predicting heart disease risk using the UCI database: methods, performance, and clinical context.
Article in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo develop and evaluate deep learning models for predicting heart disease using the University of California, Irvine (UCI) heart disease dataset, and to contextualize model performance against classical machine learning approaches.
methodData were extracted from the University of California Irvine (UCI) heart disease dataset, including information from Cleveland, Hungary, Switzerland, and Long Beach V, collected in 1988. The dataset comprises 1,025 patients and 14 key attributes. Deep learning models were used to analyze the data and predict heart disease risk.
resultsThe deep learning models demonstrated high accuracy in predicting heart disease risk. The Random Forest model achieved an accuracy of 99%. Significant predictors included exercise-induced angina and downsloping ST segments. The data revealed that 72% of females and 42% of males experienced heart attacks. There was a 79% chance that atypical angina and a 77% chance that non-anginal pain would lead to a heart attack. Exercise-induced angina had a 67% chance of resulting in a heart attack, while downsloping of the peak exercise ST segment had a 72% chance. Additionally, a 71% chance was observed for heart attacks in patients with no major coronary artery blockage (ca=0), and a 75% chance for those with a potentially reversible thalassemia-related defect (thal=2). Age groups 40-44 and 50-54 had a 76% and 61% risk of heart attacks, respectively.
conclusionDeep learning models can significantly enhance heart disease risk prediction, leading to improved treatment strategies. These findings can aid in early diagnosis and timely interventions, improving clinical outcomes for heart disease patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.