Evidence mapPaperPMID 41568130Full record

ReviewJournal of metabolic and bariatric surgery2025

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Patients With a BMI ≥50 kg/m

Mostafa Mohammed Saad Mahran, Neha Patel, Karim Ataya, Dima Salloum, Almoutuz Aljaafreh, Devalia Kalpana, Adam Goralczyk, Kozar Agha, Oday Al Asadi, Wah Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mostafa Mohammed Saad MahranDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Homerton University Hospital, London, UK.
Neha PatelDepartment of Transplant Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9722-9027
Karim AtayaDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9235-5313
Dima SalloumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0054-1862
Almoutuz AljaafrehDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Homerton University Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0345-369X
Devalia KalpanaDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Homerton University Hospital, London, UK.
Adam GoralczykDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Homerton University Hospital, London, UK.
Kozar AghaDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Homerton University Hospital, London, UK.
Oday Al AsadiDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Homerton University Hospital, London, UK.
Wah YangDepartment of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2341-3310

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The prevalence of individuals with obesity classes 4 and 5 is increasing, with no optimal surgical approach identified. With the rising popularity of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), we conducted a single-arm meta-analysis to assess its outcomes in this population. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane identified studies on OAGB reporting weight loss, comorbidity remission, and complications. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio 4.4.1. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I Results: Seventeen studies including 2,274 patients (mean age, 40.44 years), were identified. The analysis revealed a rising trend up to 24 months, with a pooled excess weight loss (%) of 68.08% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.64-72.52; I Conclusion: OAGB can be a valuable option for this population, awaiting long-term data.

Indexed as

Bariatric surgeryBody mass indexGastric bypassMetabolic surgeryObesity

Identifiers

PMID41568130
PMCPMC12817813

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.