ArticleCancer2026
Outcomes following definitive treatment of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor are significantly worse for patients with neurofibromatosis type 1: A Canadian Sarcoma Research and Clinical Collaboration study.
Article in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimising Clinical Outcomes Following R1 Resection in Soft Tissue Sarcoma: An Evidence-Based Approach.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 50%, secondary to their metastatic potential and resistance to therapy. MPNSTs can arise sporadically, as a late toxicity from therapeutic radiotherapy, or in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Prior studies have demonstrated conflicting results regarding the prognosis of NF1 associated MPNST compared to non-NF1 associated MPNST (NF0). The authors hypothesized that NF1-associated MPNSTs metastasize at a higher rate and are therefore associated with worse clinical outcomes.
methodsThe authors collected data from 166 MPNST patients included in the Canadian Sarcoma Research and Clinical Collaboration (CanSaRCC) database. Of these, 54 had NF1. Patient demographics, overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of progression or relapse (CIPR), and cumulative incidence of disease metastasis (CIDM) were assessed.
resultsPatients with NF1 were younger (p < .001) and had larger tumors at MPNST diagnosis (p < .001). Two-year OS was lower, and CIPR and CIDM were higher in NF1-associated compared to NF0 MPNST. NF1 status, stage at diagnosis, tumor size, and positive surgical margins were adversely correlated to OS. Tumor location was an adverse prognostic factor for CIPR, and tumor size was the only adverse predictor for the CIDM in patients who underwent surgery.
conclusionIn summary, this study suggests that patients with NF1-associated MPNSTs experience worse outcomes. NF1 associated MPNSTs were larger and arose in locations less amenable to negative (R0) resections. Among resectable tumors, CIDM, the primary driver of survival in patients initially diagnosed with localized disease, was correlated to tumor size but not NF1 status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.