ArticleMicrobial genomics2026
Mitigation and detection of putative microbial contaminant reads from long-read metagenomic datasets.
Article in Microbial genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metagenomic sequencing of clinical samples has significantly enhanced our understanding of microbial communities. However, microbial contamination and host-derived DNA remain a major obstacle to accurate data interpretation. Here, we present a methodology called 'Stop-Check-Go' for detecting and mitigating contaminants in metagenomic datasets obtained from neonatal patient samples (nasal and rectal swabs). This method incorporates laboratory and bioinformatics work combining a prevalence method, coverage estimation and microbiological reports. We compared the 'Stop-Check-Go' decontamination system with other published decontamination tools and commonly found poor performance in decontaminating microbiologically negative patients (false positives). We emphasize that host DNA decreased by an average of 76% per sample using a lysis method and was further reduced during post-sequencing analysis. Microbial species were classified as putative contaminants and assigned to 'Stop' in nearly 60% of the dataset. The 'Stop-Check-Go' system was developed to address the specific need of decontaminating low-biomass samples, where existing tools primarily designed for short-read metagenomic data showed limited performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.