ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2026
Midurethral Sling Surgery: Impacts on Sexual Function and Approaches to Complications.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisStress urinary incontinence (SUI) is highly prevalent among adult women and can significantly impact quality of life (QoL), including sexual function (SF). The midurethral sling (MUS) has become the gold-standard intervention for SUI owing to its high efficacy and minimal invasiveness. However, its impact on SF is less well understood. This review is aimed at examining the impact of MUS techniques on SF in women with SUI and outlines evidence-based interventions for managing MUS complications or failure.
methodsThe PubMed database was searched to identify original, peer-reviewed articles published from 2014 to 2025 that examined changes in SF and treatment options in patients undergoing MUS surgery for SUI.
resultsNinety-eight studies were included in this review. Our analysis found that most studies reported an improvement or preservation of SF following MUS placement. However, surgical outcomes varied depending on the type of sling, follow-up duration, and individual patient characteristics. A subset of patients may also experience postoperative complications such as mesh exposure and recurrent incontinence, requiring further intervention. Treatment options after MUS failure range from conservative approaches, including pelvic floor muscle training and steroid injections, to more invasive surgical interventions such as sling mobilization or removal, urethral bulking injections, and repeat SUI surgeries.
conclusionFurther long-term studies using validated SF instruments are needed to guide clinical decision-making and optimize outcomes for women undergoing MUS surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41569410What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.