Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41569756›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical focus2026

Utility of intracranial pressure monitoring in idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients with refractory headaches: an 8-year, single-surgeon, specialized-center retrospective study.

S Farzad Maroufi, Pravarakhya Puppalla, Sai Chandan Reddy, Omkar Katkade, Michael Meggyesy, John N Theodore, Ryan P Lee, Aruna Rao, Mark G Luciano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S Farzad Maroufi *1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Pravarakhya Puppalla *1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sai Chandan Reddy1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Omkar Katkade1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael Meggyesy1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
John N Theodore1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ryan P Lee2Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee; and.
Aruna Rao3Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mark G Luciano1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Summer Research Training in Aging for Medical StudentsT35AG026758 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Stephanie Nothelle, Sevil Yasar · 2005 to 2026
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS T35 AG026758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIdiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a complex disorder characterized by chronically elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) resulting in headaches and the threat of vision loss. In patients with refractory symptoms despite standard treatments, invasive ICP monitoring (ICPm) may provide critical physiological insights to guide management. However, data on the clinical utility of ICPm in IIH remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of ICPm in IIH patients with refractory symptoms.

methodsThe authors performed a retrospective analysis of the medical records of 158 adults with IIH who underwent intraparenchymal ICPm for refractory headaches from 2016 to 2023. ICP data were classified into patterns of normal, high, low, or mixed pressure. Multilevel binomial regression models were used to assess predictors of symptom improvement, adjusting for ICPm indication, final diagnosis, and intervention type. Symptom changes were evaluated at follow-up.

resultsThe cohort was predominantly female (89.9%), with a mean age of 38.9 ± 10.9 years. All patients presented with chronic headaches, with 35.4% reporting positional headaches, 54.4% visual disturbances, and 24.7% auditory symptoms. Indications for ICPm included shunt dysregulation (52.5%), suspected CSF leakage (36.1%), and elevated ICP (11.4%). Prior to ICPm, 63.9% of patients had CSF shunts in place. ICPm revealed normal pressure in 55.0%, high pressure in 10.8%, low pressure in 22.2%, and mixed patterns in 12.0% of patients. Based on ICPm findings, 42.4% of patients underwent shunt-related interventions, 6.3% received medical therapy, and 34.2% were referred to relevant clinics. Symptom improvement was observed in 46.2% of patients with headaches and > 70% with visual and auditory symptoms. Multivariable analysis showed that older age (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-1.00; p = 0.05) and non-ICP-directed treatments (symptomatic management and referral, both p < 0.02) were associated with lower odds of headache improvement, while the presence of an empty sella on imaging correlated with higher odds of improvement (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.07-7.46; p = 0.04). ICPm indications had comparable odds of improvement. Referrals and non-ICP-modifying treatments were associated with lower odds of symptom improvement.

conclusionsICPm is a valuable tool in managing IIH patients with refractory symptoms, providing diagnostic clarity, guiding management decisions, and potentially avoiding unnecessary interventions. These findings underscore the heterogeneity of ICP dynamics in IIH and support ICPm as an important adjunct in complex cases.

Indexed as

HeadacheIntracranial PressurePseudotumor CerebriAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicRetrospective Studiesidiopathic intracranial hypertensionintracranial pressuremonitoringrefractory headache

Identifiers

PMID41569756
PMCPMC13399064

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.