ArticleNeurosurgical focus2026
Utility of intracranial pressure monitoring in idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients with refractory headaches: an 8-year, single-surgeon, specialized-center retrospective study.
Article in Neurosurgical focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIdiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a complex disorder characterized by chronically elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) resulting in headaches and the threat of vision loss. In patients with refractory symptoms despite standard treatments, invasive ICP monitoring (ICPm) may provide critical physiological insights to guide management. However, data on the clinical utility of ICPm in IIH remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of ICPm in IIH patients with refractory symptoms.
methodsThe authors performed a retrospective analysis of the medical records of 158 adults with IIH who underwent intraparenchymal ICPm for refractory headaches from 2016 to 2023. ICP data were classified into patterns of normal, high, low, or mixed pressure. Multilevel binomial regression models were used to assess predictors of symptom improvement, adjusting for ICPm indication, final diagnosis, and intervention type. Symptom changes were evaluated at follow-up.
resultsThe cohort was predominantly female (89.9%), with a mean age of 38.9 ± 10.9 years. All patients presented with chronic headaches, with 35.4% reporting positional headaches, 54.4% visual disturbances, and 24.7% auditory symptoms. Indications for ICPm included shunt dysregulation (52.5%), suspected CSF leakage (36.1%), and elevated ICP (11.4%). Prior to ICPm, 63.9% of patients had CSF shunts in place. ICPm revealed normal pressure in 55.0%, high pressure in 10.8%, low pressure in 22.2%, and mixed patterns in 12.0% of patients. Based on ICPm findings, 42.4% of patients underwent shunt-related interventions, 6.3% received medical therapy, and 34.2% were referred to relevant clinics. Symptom improvement was observed in 46.2% of patients with headaches and > 70% with visual and auditory symptoms. Multivariable analysis showed that older age (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-1.00; p = 0.05) and non-ICP-directed treatments (symptomatic management and referral, both p < 0.02) were associated with lower odds of headache improvement, while the presence of an empty sella on imaging correlated with higher odds of improvement (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.07-7.46; p = 0.04). ICPm indications had comparable odds of improvement. Referrals and non-ICP-modifying treatments were associated with lower odds of symptom improvement.
conclusionsICPm is a valuable tool in managing IIH patients with refractory symptoms, providing diagnostic clarity, guiding management decisions, and potentially avoiding unnecessary interventions. These findings underscore the heterogeneity of ICP dynamics in IIH and support ICPm as an important adjunct in complex cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.