ArticleJCI insight2026
Coronary pathophysiology in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Article in JCI insight, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUNDIdiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) alters right ventricular size and function, curtailing life expectancy. Patients may experience angina and myocardial ischemia. However, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood.METHODSThis study had a cross-sectional, case-control design. Patients with IPAH undergoing right heart catheterization were prospectively enrolled and underwent functional testing during coronary angiography using a dual pressure/temperature-sensitive guidewire. Cardiovascular MRI measured left and right ventricular mass and function. Right ventricular tissue from individuals with end-stage PAH and control individuals were analyzed for pathophysiology.RESULTSEleven IPAH and 15 control participants completed the protocol: 73% of IPAH patients had an elevated index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR > 25) and 55% had reduced coronary flow reserve (CFR < 2.0). Mean IMR was significantly higher in IPAH participants (39.2 ± 27.0 vs. 15.3 ± 5.0, P = 0.002), whereas mean CFR was lower (2.8 ± 2.1 vs. 4.0 ± 1.4; P = 0.077). Paired right coronary artery/ventricular measurements (n = 6) revealed IMR positively correlated with right ventricular mass (r = 0.91, P = 0.12) and negatively with CFR (r = -0.82, P = 0.046). Compared with controls (n = 5), PAH participants (n = 4) had reduced right ventricular capillary density, increased cardiomyocyte area, and increased mural area in pre-capillary arterioles.CONCLUSIONInvasive coronary function testing was feasible and safe in IPAH. Coronary microvascular dysfunction was prevalent in IPAH and correlated with increased right ventricular mass. Histopathology revealed vascular rarefaction and remodeling of pre-capillary arterioles.FUNDINGThe British Heart Foundation (BHF) (PG/18/6134217) and the Golden Jubilee Research Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.