ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Probing the dark energy in the functional protein universe.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From static structures to dynamic energy landscapes: the latest revolution in molecular biology.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026Review
- Determinants of Protein Folding Pathways: Lessons from Metamorphic Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- An information-theoretic argument for the restriction of the current biological alphabets to 4 nucleotides and 20 amino acids.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deconvolving mutation effects on protein stability and function with disentangled protein language models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Probing the dark energy in the functional protein universe.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We show how to localize and quantify the functional evolutionary constraints on natural proteins. Protein folding has been one of the strongest constraints in sequence evolution. The method we propose compares the perturbations caused by local sequence variants to the energetics of the protein folding process and to the corresponding change to the apparent selection landscape of sequences over the evolutionary time scale. The difference between the physical folding free energies and the evolutionary free energies can be called a "dark energy." We analyze various protein sets and thereby show that dark energy is largely localized at functional sites, which are also often energetically frustrated from the point of view of folding. Overall, we find that about 25% of the positions of the folded globular proteins display some significant dark energy. When a function relies on a free energy that can be thermodynamically quantified, such as the binding energy to a partner, the relationship of this physical free energy with dark energy can be used to define a functional selection temperature, just as there is a selection temperature for folding. We show that selection for folding and binding functions bear similar weights in specific protein-protein interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.