ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2026
Is nasogastric intubation still necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy? A case-control cohort study.
Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims: The benefits of nasogastric intubation after pancreaticoduodenectomy are not well understood, and it remains unclear which patients may need nasogastric intubation in the immediate postoperative period. This study evaluated the effectiveness of nasogastric intubation following pancreaticoduodenectomy and identified factors influencing the reintubation rate. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control cohort study involving adult patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for either benign or malignant periampullary disease, with a 90-day follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups: the nasogastric tube (NGT) was removed at the end of the procedure (NGT-removed group, n = 110; case group) or retained during the postoperative recovery (NGT-retained group, n = 100; control group). Results: The overall postoperative complication rate (grades I-IVb) was 40.4%. The only significant difference between the groups was a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting in the NGT-removed group ( Conclusions: There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes, reinsertion rates, or postoperative complications between the two groups, indicating that the removal of the NGT after pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe. However, univariate analysis revealed that postoperative complications significantly affected the need for NGT reinsertion, suggesting that nasogastric decompression may be crucial for patients at high risk for complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.