ArticleScientific reports2026
A proteomics and redox proteomics approach to understanding ARDS heterogeneity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a severe and heterogeneous critical illness characterized by systemic inflammation, lung injury, and profound hypoxemia. To investigate the temporal evolution of molecular features underlying ARDS heterogeneity, we applied advanced proteomics and redox proteomics to matched plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid samples collected longitudinally from 16 intensive care unit (ICU) ARDS patients during hospitalization. Exploratory, data-driven hierarchical clustering (Ward method) identified three distinct molecular patterns across patients represented as Groups A, B, and C. This framework was associated with illness severity at study enrollment (Group A profiling patients with more severe illness at enrollment), demonstrated temporal stability across sampling timepoints, and revealed molecular features associated with clinical improvement during hospitalization. Key pathways distinguishing the molecular patterns and consistent with prior findings included the production and detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS), Liver X receptor–Retinoid X receptor (LXR/RXR) activation and 24-dehydrocholesterol reductase (DHCR24) signaling, interleukin-12 (IL-12) signaling and production in macrophages, and neutrophil degranulation. Although plasma proteomic profiles were generally consistent with findings in BAL fluid, BAL fluid data were more mechanistically informative and enabled clearer and more consistent interrogation of ARDS molecular heterogeneity. The results highlight the potential value of lung–focused, temporal studies to improve patient stratification and guide future therapeutic strategies. However, the modest cohort size and exploratory nature of this study necessitate cautious interpretation of pathway-level inferences. Future longitudinal studies in larger, independent ARDS cohorts will be required to validate these molecular groups and assess their clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.