ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Predicting fall risk among older adults with sarcopenia in China using machine learning models: a six-year longitudinal study from CHARLS.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Predicting Future Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Evidence.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveFalls constitute potentially devastating health events for older adults with sarcopenia, whereas there remains a critical gap in validated fall risk prediction models tailored to this vulnerable population in China. This study aims to develop machine learning algorithms for predicting 6-year fall risk among patients with sarcopenia.
methodsData were used from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) spanning from 2013 to 2018. A total of 110 input variables at the baseline level were regarded as candidate features. Sarcopenia cases were identified according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria. Six machine learning models were developed through rigorous cross-validation, with model performance evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), to estimate the 6-year fall risk prediction models for patients with sarcopenia.
resultsAmong 1,087 participants with sarcopenia (mean age 71 years, 68.54% female), 246 experienced falls during follow-up. The random forest model demonstrated superior predictive performance among the six models, achieving an AUC of 0.971, sensitivity of 89.31%, specificity of 95.19%, and accuracy of 92.26%. Feature importance analysis identified 48 key predictors, with functional capacity measures, psychosocial factors, and cognitive function emerging as the strongest risk determinants.
conclusionsThe optimized random forest algorithm provides an effective tool for identifying high-risk sarcopenia patients who may benefit from targeted fall prevention strategies. These findings underscore the importance of multidimensional interventions addressing functional decline, cognitive impairment, and psychosocial well-being in sarcopenia management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.