ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
CABIT: a novel biomarkers-integrated inflammatory risk tool for ischemic heart disease developed in the USA and prospectively validated in China.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Joint assessment of white blood cell-to-HDL cholesterol ratio and waist-to-height-hemoglobin A1c for cardiometabolic multimorbidity risk: a prospective cohort study and cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Comparative associations of immune-inflammatory, immune-lipid, and metabolic composite indices with hyperuricemia among Chinese adults with glycemic abnormalities: a health examination-based cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIschemic heart disease (IHD) remains a leading cause of death globally. Most of previous predictive models rely on conventional factors or inaccessible biomarkers and lack validation in Asian populations. Novel inflammatory indicators have shown promising potential in predicting IHD risk. This study aimed to develop a new model for predicting the risk of IHD based on the novel inflammatory indicators and validate its performance prospectively in two independent Chinese cohorts.
methodsVariables were selected through Elastic Net regression from the data of 11,840 participants in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (US NHANES). Using these variables, a prediction model was developed and internally validated. Then, external validation was performed in two prospective cohorts from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University in China, with median follow-up durations of 6.0 and 6.7 years, respectively. The model, named CABIT, was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA), clinical impact curves (CIC), and net reduction analysis (NR). A nomogram was derived from the model. Finally, we compared the performances of CABIT and the existing prediction models by the systematic review.
resultsCABIT was established by incorporating the natural logarithms of the white blood cell-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (WHR), monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet -to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and conventional clinical covariates. It generated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.838 (95% CI: 0.826–0.851) in the training set, 0.823 (95% CI: 0.799–0.843) in the internal validation set, 0.831 (95% CI: 0.761–0.897) in the external validation set 1 and 0.702 (95% CI: 0.553–0.850) in the external validation set 2. Consistent calibration and clinical utility were observed across all datasets. The systematic comparisons indicated that CABIT exhibited a favorable discriminative ability and could address some limitations of previous models. An interactive web-based risk calculator for CABIT is publicly available ( https://cabit-risk-tool.netlify.app/ ).
conclusionThe CABIT showed a satisfactory performance in predicting the earlier-stage IHD across diverse populations, especially in Chinese cohorts, and might assist in timely and personalized clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.