ArticlePorcine health management2026
Cross-sectional study characterizing the porcine faecal microbiome in commercial farms.
Article in Porcine health management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe gut microbiome is regarded as an important source of information to better understand and improve health and growth in animals. However, there is a knowledge gap concerning the effects of management and health in commercial farms on the porcine faecal microbiome. This study aimed to identify the main factors associated with differences in microbiota alpha and beta diversity, resistome and functional profiles between and within farms and to study the associations between microbiome and farm characteristics. The faecal microbiomes at four production stages were examined in 18 farms, using shotgun sequencing.
resultsMicrobiota richness increased with age while evenness and Simpson diversity decreased. Production stage was associated with microbiota composition, resistome and functional profiles, and most differences in the microbiome were observed between weaned pigs and older animals. Microbiota richness, diversity and evenness were higher in farms that purchased feed and in those with lower salmonella prevalence. Microbiota composition was associated with use of zinc oxide and medicated feed in young pigs and with health, biosecurity and feed form in older pigs. Feed form was associated with resistome, functional profiles and especially with core microbiota, as dry fed pigs showed higher abundances of Streptococcus alactolyticus.
conclusionsConsistent patterns of alpha and beta diversity were observed across farms with contrasting characteristics, suggesting that the faecal microbiota in commercial pig farms is primarily driven by diet and age, rather than health. Associations between microbiome, salmonella prevalence and diet suggested that diet induced changes in the microbiome may be a determining factor in gut colonization and infection by pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.