ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Development and validation of the emotional regulation inventory (ERI) using the Rasch model.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmotional regulation is essential for mental health, cognitive development, and academic success. Existing measurement tools rely on classical test theory, limiting precision and generalizability. Most instruments also focus on specific strategies rather than capturing the multidimensional nature of emotional regulation. This study developed and validated the Emotional Regulation Inventory (ERI) using the Rasch model to ensure a psychometrically robust assessment tool for high school students. MATERIALS AND
methodsA quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted in high schools across East Java, Indonesia, with 559 students (ages 14-18) from grades 10-12 participating through convenience sampling. The ERI was based on Gross's three-dimensional framework: goal activation, process engagement, and trajectory modulation. Initially containing 48 items, it was refined to 40 through expert review and pilot testing. Students responded using a four-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using Rasch model-based psychometric testing in Winstepsoftware, assessing item fit, unidimensionality, reliability, rating scale functionality, and Differential Item Functioning (DIF).
resultsThe ERI met unidimensionality criteria, demonstrated high reliability (person reliability = 0.89, item reliability = 0.99), and showed no significant bias across demographic groups. The Wright Map confirmed effective item distribution, ensuring precise measurement.
conclusionThe ERI is a valid, reliable tool for assessing emotional regulation in high school students. Findings highlight cultural and social influences, supporting its integration into school curricula. Future research should explore cross-cultural applications and their role in enhancing students' resilience and academic success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.