Trial reportInternational wound journal2026
A Prospective Randomised Clinical Study Comparing Polygalacturonic and Caprylic Acid Ointment to Medical-Grade Honey in the Management of Chronic Wounds.
Trial report in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Prospective Randomised Clinical Study Comparing Polygalacturonic and Caprylic Acid Ointment to Medical-Grade Honey in the Management of Chronic Wounds.International wound journal · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim in this human trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of polygalacturonic-caprylic acid (PG-CAP) ointment to MediHoney in chronic wounds at three international medical centres. In this prospective open-label study, patients with chronic full-thickness wounds were randomised to daily treatment with PG-CAP ointment or MediHoney. Assessments were obtained weekly for 6 weeks. The validated Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) score was used to track healing. Efficacies were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Twenty-six patients with chronic wounds were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups; however, the history of diabetes mellitus was higher in the PG-CAP group (p = 0.011). All 13 PG-CAP patients showed improvement (100%), compared to only 69% of the 13 MediHoney patients (p = 0.023). Half of the failures in the MediHoney arm were associated with death (15%). No failures, adverse events or deaths occurred in the PG-CAP arm. PG-CAP wound ointment is a novel combination of two plant-based compounds that pose minimal risk of promoting antimicrobial resistance, was highly effective for eradicating wound-pathogen biofilms in vitro and promoted chronic wound healing in vivo with minimal inflammatory reactions. Our findings support PG-CAP as safe, noninferior and possibly more effective than MediHoney in healing chronic contaminated wounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.