ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2026
Weight-band-based simplification of oral allometric miltefosine dosing in paediatric patients with visceral leishmaniasis.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesAn allometric miltefosine regimen dosed based on fat-free mass (FFM) is effective and safe in treating children with visceral leishmaniasis (VL). However, its complexity hinders successful implementation in endemic areas. We aimed to develop a simplified dosing based on weight bands (WBs) that achieves equivalent miltefosine exposure in a paediatric VL population using a simulation-based approach.
methodsUtilizing demographic data from 9379 Eastern African paediatric VL patients, WHO-CDC growth curves were adjusted to create a realistic virtual paediatric VL population. The virtual children were given either an allometric FFM-based, a WB-based or a 2.5 mg/kg dosing of miltefosine per day. To compare the regimens, two pharmacokinetic metrics were derived from the simulated patient population receiving the allometric FFM-based regimen: the 5th percentile of the time above the concentration associated with 90% in vitro intracellular parasite killing for efficacy and the 95th percentile of the AUC for safety. The performance of the dosing regimens was evaluated for both 14- and 28-day regimens.
resultsA virtual population was constructed that closely resembled real-world paediatric Eastern African VL patients' height- and weight-for-age distributions. Target attainment rates for the two pharmacokinetic metrics tested differed by less than 1.5% between the final WB- and FFM-based dosing regimens. The final doses in mg were 20 for children under 6 kg, 30 for 6.0-9.9 kg, 50 for 10.0-14.9 kg, 60 for 15.0-19.9 kg, 70 for 20.0-24.9 kg and 80 for 25.0-29.9 kg, for both 14- and 28-day regimens.
conclusionsOur simplified WB-based dosing strategy offers a practical alternative for allometric miltefosine dosing in children, yielding satisfactory exposure levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.