Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41575497›Full record

ReviewEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2026

Predicting peptide orientation in membrane interactions: a review on transmembrane and surface-bound states.

Lúcio Otávio Nunes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lúcio Otávio NunesDirectory of Research, Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys, MGT 367 Road, Km 583, n. 5000, Alto da Jacuba, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, 39100-000, Brazil. lucio.otavio@ufvjm.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3707-2633

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mechanism of action of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) is a key step in developing new antimicrobial agents. This mechanism is often linked to the peptide’s orientation upon interaction with lipid membranes—whether it inserts into the membrane or remains surface-bound. Despite its importance, the literature lacks a systematic approach to predict peptide orientation based on physicochemical characteristics. This review highlights how peptide orientation at membranes can be qualitatively predicted by integrating sequence-level features, length/effective span, amphipathicity, charge distribution, and helix propensity, with membrane/environmental variables. The approach is illustrated with representative AMPs and it is discussed how external factors (pH, anionic fraction, cholesterol, ionic strength) bias surface-bound versus transmembrane regimes. The review is built upon theoretical observations and integrates structural, thermodynamic, and electrostatic parameters drawn from experimental data in the literature. While this study does not aim to provide a definitive classification, it offers a starting point that may guide experimental validation and future refinement.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial PeptidesCell MembraneLipid BilayersStatic ElectricitySurface PropertiesAntimicrobial PeptidesLipid BilayersAntimicrobial peptidesMembrane interactionSurface-bound stateTransmembrane insertion

Identifiers

PMID41575497
PMCPMC12929272

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.