Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41575959›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2026

Multi-modal data to identify key factors influencing lung injury in ARDS patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation: A prospective multi-center observational study protocol.

Zhimei Duan, Di Lian, Kaifei Wang, Ye Hu, Han Fu, Ruoxuan Wen, Ying Zhao, Xingshuo Hu, Pan Pan, Jianqiao Xu and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05922826 (Clinical Empirical Research of ARDS), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05922826 unknown statusnot on this map

Clinical Empirical Research of ARDS

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorChinese PLA General HospitalRan2023 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsInvasive Mechanical Ventilation ARDS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Zhimei DuanCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6076-5406
Di LianCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Kaifei WangCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ye HuCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Han FuCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ruoxuan WenCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ying ZhaoCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xingshuo HuCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Pan PanCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jianqiao XuCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jin ChenCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Li XiaoCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lin WangCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiao YuThe Fifth Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xiaobo HanCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wuxiang XiePeking University Clinical Research Institute, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Fei XieCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lixin XieCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhihai HanCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) exhibit extremely poor prognoses following mechanical ventilation, with mortality rates as high as 40% to 55%. Despite extensive research into ARDS classification and prognostic assessment, the disease's pathogenesis remains incompletely understood, and there remains a critical lack of specific biomarkers and effective therapeutic targets for its prevention and management. The core challenges lie in two key areas. First, ARDS demonstrates marked heterogeneity in etiology, pathophysiology, and pathogenesis. Existing research, predominantly reliant on population-level average data, fails to capture inter-individual variability, hindering the precise identification of patient subgroups responsive to specific therapeutic regimens. Second, current definitions of ARDS phenotypes are often confined to clinical symptoms and routine diagnostic indices, lacking integrated analysis of deeper mechanistic indicators, such as key biomarkers and respiratory mechanics parameters, thereby limiting the stability and clinical utility of existing classification systems. METHODS/

designWe designed a prospective multicenter cohort study incorporating multi-omics analyses. This research aims to investigate the mechanisms underlying the development and progression of ARDS during mechanical ventilation, providing a theoretical foundation and practical guidance for future ARDS therapies. The study plans to enroll over 165 patients with moderate to severe ARDS receiving mechanical ventilation across 10 medical centers. Peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples will be collected on the first 24 hours after enrollment and at extubation for metagenomic/meta-transcriptomic sequencing, bulk RNA sequencing, single-cell RNA sequencing, proteomics detection, and metabolomics analyses. Concurrently, comprehensive monitoring of physiological indices, electrical impedance tomography, transpulmonary pressure, pulmonary ultrasound findings, and other relevant parameters will be conducted during the enrollment. Study participants will be stratified by survival and mortality outcomes to analyze the dynamic trends of all measured indices and their underlying molecular mechanisms. Biomarkers derived from multi-omics data and clinical baseline characteristics will be evaluated and integrated, followed by multidimensional dimensionality reduction. Predictive models will be subsequently constructed via early or late fusion to identify core prognostic markers, with performance validated using standardized metrics. DISCUSSION: Through comparative analysis of multi-omics data, we aim to identify specific markers and risk factors associated with distinct clinical trajectories of ARDS, further clarifying the key determinants of lung injury. Ultimately, this research will reveal critical immune cell subtypes that govern ARDS onset and prognosis, offering novel insights and therapeutic targets to advance precision medicine for ARDS. STUDY PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05922826.

Indexed as

Lung InjuryRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID41575959
PMCPMC12829816

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.