ArticlePloS one2026
Explainable AI framework for improved Thalassemia mental health classification and feature selection.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond classification metrics: a psychometric-aware benchmark for data augmentation in imbalanced student mental health surveys.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health challenges in Thalassemia patients are often overlooked, despite their significant impact on quality of life. Traditional statistical and machine learning approaches often fail to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships between psychosocial and clinical variables, limiting both accuracy and interpretability. To overcome this, we propose the Adaptive Multi-Stage Ensemble with Dynamic Feature Interaction (AMSE-DFI)-a novel feature selection framework that dynamically integrates mutual information, ensemble learning, and graph attention mechanisms to capture intricate feature interdependencies often missed by traditional approaches. Using the SF-36 health survey data from 356 Bangladeshi patients, AMSE-DFI effectively identified key predictors such as total SF score, role emotional, and physical health summary, which collectively reflect both physical and psychological well-being. The model outperformed conventional approaches, showing strong predictive reliability and robust generalization, with SMOTE effectively addressing class imbalance in the clinical data. Importantly, Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) based explainable AI offered clear, interpretable insights into how key features affect individual patient outcomes, making the model more understandable and actionable for clinicians. This framework provides a practical, transparent tool to support early detection and personalized management of mental health challenges in Thalassemia care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.