Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41577132›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM2026

Time of day of induction impacts the total duration of labor.

Kylie Cataldo, Robert Long, Isoken Olomu, Rene Cortese, Hanne M Hoffmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kylie CataldoDepartments of Pediatrics and Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO (Cataldo and Cortese).
Robert LongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (Long).
Isoken OlomuDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Human Development, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (Olomu).
Rene CorteseDepartments of Pediatrics and Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO (Cataldo and Cortese); MU Institute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO (Cataldo and Cortese). Electronic address: rcortese@kumc.edu.
Hanne M HoffmannDepartment of Animal Sciences and the Reproductive and Developmental Sciences Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (Hoffmann).

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVID P OLSON · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Chemical exposure disruption of the placental circadian clockR01ES035691 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Almudena Veiga-Lopez · 2024 to 2026
$2.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES035691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpontaneous labor onset peaks during the late evening and early morning hours, indicating a circadian influence on parturition. However, the effect of the time of day of labor induction on labor duration and obstetrical outcomes remains unexplored. We hypothesize that the time of day of labor induction affects induction of labor duration and the risk of cesarean delivery.

objectiveThis study aimed to determine whether the time of day of labor induction impacts induction of labor duration and delivery outcomes in term pregnancies, and whether maternal characteristics such as body mass index and parity modulate this effect. STUDY

designThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 3363 term pregnant participants who underwent induction at a single US hospital between 2019 and 2022. Time of induction was defined as the time of administration of the first cervical ripening agent or synthetic oxytocin (ie, Pitocin). Induction of labor duration was calculated as the time from induction to delivery. Multivariable analyses, survival models, and circadian rhythm analyses were performed to evaluate associations between time of day of labor induction, induction of labor duration, cesarean delivery, and neonatal outcomes.

resultsInduction of labor duration followed a significant circadian rhythm (P<.05, Lomb-Scargle), with a gradual lengthening in duration when induction was initiated later in the day, peaking at 11:00 ᴘᴍ (average duration of 21.0 vs 14.8 hours at 5:00 ᴀᴍ; P<.01, Kruskal-Wallis test). Participants induced during the early morning had up to 6 hours shorter labor compared with those induced in the late evening (P<.01). The optimal time of day for initiating labor induction was influenced by body mass index and parity, with significant differences in delivery probability by time of day of labor induction among nulliparous obese (P<.05, 2-way analysis of variance), and parous obese participants (P<.05). Time of induction was associated with reduced cesarean delivery rates and did not impact rates of neonatal intensive care unit admission or adverse neonatal outcomes.

conclusionThe time of day when labor induction was initiated influenced induction of labor duration, with the shortest duration observed when induction occurred during early morning hours. No increase in adverse maternal or fetal outcomes was identified after accounting for the time of day of labor induction. The optimal time of day for inducing labor is influenced by body mass index and parity and should be considered when performing this common obstetrical intervention.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionCircadian RhythmLabor, InducedLabor, ObstetricAdultBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansOxytocicsOxytocinParityPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsOxytocicsOxytocincesarean deliverycircadian rhythminduction of laborlabor durationobesityparitytime-of-day

Identifiers

PMID41577132
PMCPMC13377848

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.