Observational studyOphthalmology. Retina2026
OCT Risk Factors for Progression to Late-Stage Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the Amish Eye Study.
Observational study in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cuticular Drusen and the Risk of Progression to Late Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A MACUSTAR Study Report.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Spatial distribution of cuticular drusen and its association with category-specific progression risk in intermediate AMD.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers Predicting Progression to Atrophy in Non-Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Predicting risk of progression of early to late AMD in the aging eye through imaging and multimodal evaluation: PRIME study protocol.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo characterize the prevalence of some critical OCT biomarkers-including cuticular drusen and acquired vitelliform lesions (AVLs)-and to identify their relative risk for progression to late age-related macular degeneration (AMD) over 2 years in subjects with early or intermediate AMD in the Amish Eye Study.
designProspective, observational, longitudinal, population-based cohort study.
participantsThis study included 276 eyes from 171 subjects with early or intermediate AMD at baseline who completed the 2-year follow-up.
methodsBaseline OCT scans were evaluated for the presence of cuticular drusen, AVLs, subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDDs), high drusen volume (defined as ≥0.2 mm
main outcome measuresIncidence of late AMD (geographic atrophy or macular neovascularization) at 2 years as determined by multimodal imaging (OCT, color fundus photography, and confocal fundus autofluorescence).
resultsBy 2 years of follow-up, 26 eyes (10.7%) progressed to late AMD. The most prevalent baseline features in this cohort, in descending order, were cuticular drusen (52.3%), IHRF (17.3%), hDC (16.0%), thin DLS (11.9%), SDD (8.2%), iRORA (7.8%), AVL (7.0%), and high drusen volume (2.5%). The mean SFCT was 243.23 ± 75.45 μm. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of thick DLS, iRORA, AVL, SDD, IHRF, hDC, and SFCT was associated with an increased risk of progression. In multivariate regression, only the presence of iRORA (odds ratio [OR], 29.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.86-127.84; P < 0.001) and AVL (OR, 15.90; 95% CI, 3.24-78.00; P < 0.001) remained significant, whereas the presence of IHRF showed borderline significance (OR, 4.71; 95% CI, 1.00-22.16; P = 0.050).
conclusionsIn this cohort, the presence of iRORA and AVL was independently associated with progression to late AMD over 2 years. Although cuticular drusen were highly prevalent, their presence, as assessed in this study, was not significantly associated with an increased risk of progression to late AMD. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.